Most people mistakenly believe that the account is classified as a selling expense and therefore, they should be charged the selling expenses tax on the account. They are making a mistake. The account’s classification is not a selling expense.
Selling expenses tax is a tax on the purchase price of an account. If a seller does not pay the sales tax on the account, the seller is charged a tax on both the purchase price and the account. The account is not classified as a selling expense because it’s not a sale of an item we’ve bought.
Again, these are mistakes made by people who are trying to make a buck and not by the seller. They should just pay the selling expenses tax on the account.
Selling expenses tax is a tax on the purchase price of an account, so why should the seller pay it? The seller pays the buyer because the buyer paid the purchase price on the account. But if the seller doesnt pay the selling expenses tax on the account, the seller is not charged a tax on the account. Thats because the seller is not buying a product with the buyer.
A seller should never buy a product with the buyer, but a buyer is buying a product with the seller. The seller is buying a product with no buyer and therefore has no buyer.
I don’t know why I don’t like the title of this post, but it’s a nice post, and it shows how to use the tool you’ve learned from the previous post. It’s a great book, and I found it helpful.
A good way to look at this is to define one thing that a buyer has learned from the previous post: how to trade your car.
The seller has no customer, and therefore has no buyer. The buyer has a customer, and therefore has a buyer. These relationships are similar to the way a person exchanges money. You give your money to the person you like and they give you their money.