If services are rendered on account, then you are the beneficiary of a service. In this case, I can’t help but think of the old expression “the breadwinner takes the kids to the movies.” But, if this is the case, the breadwinner is the one who receives the services rendered.
This is actually another way to think of services in that we’re all in control of our lives, but we’re not actually paid for them. The breadwinner receives the benefit of the service rendered, but it doesn’t make that person a “beneficiary” of the service or the money owed. It’s just an agreement.
In this case, we’re not talking about a service we actually receive in the sense that we actually pay for it. We’re talking about a service that takes place between two parties. The idea here is that the service is something that is agreed upon. In this case, the service is the delivery of a service. We have a service that the breadwinner receives in return for his labor, but the breadwinner is not a beneficiary.
If I were to pay a bill I would be sending the money to my employer, so that I can receive a service I’ve agreed to receive. The breadwinner is not a beneficiary either because I don’t give the money to him to pay for the service. His services are a part of my labor but not a part of the service of my employer.
This is a pretty common way to do things, but in the case of a service, its not always agreed upon. If I were to send a check to myself I could get nothing in return for my labor, the money would become the property of my employer, and I would have no interest in the service. If I sent a check to the breadwinner, I would get back some of the money I would have paid for the service.
The service of a person is considered to be a part of the person that renders the service, and the employer is the person that pays for the service. In the case of a service like a mortgage, it is the employer that pays the mortgage. The company that owns the property that the house sits on that has the mortgage is the employer.
So if your employer is doing a service on the account, then it is your employer who has the money in the account. If the person you are dealing with is your employer, then you are the employer, and it may be the time you are doing the service that is the issue, but it is you who is paying for the service.
If the employer is doing a service on your account, then it can still be the time you are doing the service that is the issue, but you are the employer, and it is you that is paying for it. So if you are a student with your own bank account and you are doing a service on that account, then you are the employee.
That is a good definition of the concept of “account” and “service” that is so often used in the workplace.
In other words, if your employer is doing a service on your account, it is you who is paying for it. In fact, the employer should not even be doing a service on your account. The employer should be the one doing the service. If your employer is doing a service on your account, then it is you who is paying for it.