So, when should I use the word contingency? I personally use it in the context of when you’re preparing for a certain type of event.
In the movie Armageddon, there is an entire section devoted to the contingency planning of the survivors of the nuclear winter. The key, as most of you know, is to think about the contingencies that are set up, even if you haven’t planned for them in advance.
A contingency is a place you can safely go to if you dont have any other options. In the movie, the survivors arent even sure who is going to be the next president. There are many things from this movie that were not planned for, and you should plan for them, even if you havent planned for them in advance.
It’s important to think about these contingencies before you react to them. For example, when the Japanese exploded the U.S. Pacific fleet (or nuclear bomb?) it was planned as a way to keep us from the Japanese from invading the West. It was a way to prevent the U.S. from taking over the West. It was also a place you could go to if you didnt have other options.
But because he didnt plan it, he was a victim of his own recklessness. We are now in the age of the “contingency versus mitigation” problem. We are told that the Japanese are evil and want to wipe us all out, but because of the fact that we destroyed the Pacific fleet, it was an act of “contingency.
The contingency argument is that we should not have fought the Japanese with the West’s military forces. We should have allowed them to invade the West and take over. The mitigation argument is that we shouldnt have even fought the Japanese in the first place. In a world with unlimited resources, you wouldnt need to fight a powerful enemy to win. We should have done something.
In a world with unlimited resources, you wouldnt need to fight a powerful enemy to win. We shouldve just done something. In a world with unlimited resources, you wouldnt think to build a gun that can kill thousands of people. In a world with unlimited resources, you wouldnt need to kill thousands of people to win. But in the world where we live, we do need to kill people.
We need a contingency plan. In a world where we don’t need to fight a powerful enemy, we need to fight people. In a world where we don’t need to win, we need to survive.
Our contingency plan in the apocalypse is to fight everyone, and to fight ourselves. In a world where we dont need to fight a powerful enemy, there are people to fight too. In a world where we dont need to win, there are people to survive. But in that world, we need to have a contingency plan.
We’ve all heard of the “good planning” mantra that says we should always have a contingency plan – always have a backup plan that will work in case we need it. In a world where we do not always need to fight a powerful enemy, this might sound like a good thing, but it’s actually a terrible idea. First of all, it’s a plan that will only work when you have an enemy. Second of all, it makes you responsible for everyone else.