I’m not sure exactly what this means, but I think I’ve used the word “fledged” somewhere in this post.
Im not sure what this means either. I know what it means. Its a little bit of a misnomer, but I’m pretty sure its about when a small group of people become part of a larger group of people.
A fledged group is a group of people who are all connected because they are all related. They are not a group of people that can be divided up into smaller groups by a leader or a certain position.
The definition of “fledged” is one group of people that have grown together over the course of many years. When this happens for small groups of people, that group can develop into a tribe. As a result, the tribe could become larger and more cohesive.
This is in contrast to a group of people who become a tribe because they are not connected by any particular leader or position.
When you’re on a mission and your mission doesn’t involve a single person, the mission is much more complicated. It’s not necessarily a big deal to do in the first place, but in the next. The mission can have a great impact on the people in the group, but if you don’t do it, the group changes. The mission doesn’t have to be the same as the mission, though.
A tribe is a group of people who are connected by a common goal, a common ideology, or a common leader. If a group has a common goal, then they are more cohesive. This does not apply to a group of people who are not connected to a common goal, of course. Think of a group of people who have no common idea of freedom, a common ideology, or a common leader. The group still exists, but its not cohesive.
Well, how can a group of people be more cohesive if no one knows who the leader is? Well, they can be even more cohesive if no one knows who the leader is because then they can all work together to create a common goal and shared ideology and still be more coherent than those who do know. In other words, a group of people who do not know each other, but still form a cohesive group, can do so without a leader.
If you have a leader who can keep your group alive, and who can keep you alive, then you should be able to keep your followers alive, but you also need to have a leader who is trustworthy.
I think it’s easier to survive in a group where everyone knows the rules and the leader is trustworthy. And that’s why I think in a group where you don’t know who the leader is, you should try to keep your followers alive. I know that’s an unpopular opinion, but I think it’s a good one.